This is an argument defense counsel had the opportunity to effectively rebut in closing argument. Neither cousin was happy with his place within the family hierarchy. We conclude the risk was very low. He noted that in a stack of paper, indentations can appear five pages down.
Colusa Obituaries - Latest Obituaries in Colusa, CA - Echovita According to CBS Sacramento, the Sheriffs Office received a letter on August 12, 2011 claiming responsibility for detonating the bomb. After a few years, Martin Tucker told Roger that Peter and his friends were shooting every bird in the sky. While Peter and Paul have very different dispositions, they share similar grievances and similar life trajectories. Roger, Pauls father, got tied up in a civil suit brought by Ayalas wife, where she alleged that he must have been aware or should have been aware of Pauls malice and past criminal activities. Chance of rain 100%. In fact, after Roberto injured his shoulder, Paul accompanied him on occasion to the irrigation pumps to adjust water levels. The straightedge drawing is -- the diagram depicts -- what we're led to believe is that the diagram depicts the electrical box. Roger, along with his brother, Arlan, used to own Moore Brothers Farm in Colusa, California. ROGER HICKEL OBITUARY. He argues that the trial court's error violated his right to a fair trial and due process of law under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. The action you just performed triggered the security solution. In his trial, he received a guilty verdict and was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. As a child he rigged his light switch; as a father he taught his son how to hardwire his car; as a farmer he designed a mud chisel, rice rollers, and a fertilizer aqua bar. Peter tried to convince his grandmother Mimi to disinherit his father, confident that his Uncle Roger would be more fair. He needs to be careful. Paul Moore was found guilty on Friday of first-degree murder of Moore Bros. farm foreman Roberto Ayala in Colusa County after the jury deliberated for about five hours. "(The murder) is really the unfortunate product that came out, in spite of Roger's well-meaning efforts to do well by his family and do well by the company," Druliner said. We cannot say the trial court abused its discretion by admitting evidence of a pattern of fascination and aptitude with building things, some requiring electrical aptitude and some that did not. And Roberto Ayala, in particular, was the target of his wrath. In addition, he had a violent disposition and leveled threats to harm not only Roberto, but his father, his uncle, and many others who upset him. Ayala died instantly from the explosive device, and fire and law enforcement officials originally believed the explosion was an accident. Roger Moore also testified that his son had technical and electrical expertise, a characteristic that the prosecution said was necessary to construct the bomb. Both suffered physically. Like the first letter, the text of the second was made with a label maker and photocopied. He felt mistreated by everyone, including Peter. Paul Moore of Grimes,.
Roberto Ayala's Murder: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know 107 5th Street, Colusa, CA 95932 Paul Moore is currently serving life in prison without the possibility of parole. He threatened to beat [his] dad's ass on multiple occasions. While there is no evidence that he actually had been disinherited, Peter believed he had and that Roberto would be the recipient of his share of the farm. While it might sound like a humble title, Roger is seemingly quite well off. The prosecution called a litany of forensic experts connecting Paul to the sheet of paper with the indentations of the bomb diagram, the paper in the printer to the paper used in the diagram of the bomb, the ink in the copier to the ink used on the second letter and the diagram, the type of labels used in the letters and diagram to the type Paul used on his own files, and the fishing line found in his boat to the type of fishing line used in the bomb. The family of a Colusa County man killed in a 2011 bombing obtained a $20 million judgment against his killer, an attorney said Wednesday. Name, age, vehicle I.D. We concur with the trial court's analysis that [t]his comment can, in the context of a case where the prosecution presented dozens of witnesses over several weeks, only fairly be understood as a comment that witnesses can be called by either side. On August 18 Paul brought in another fragment he thought was suspicious and indicative of a bomb going off. He remained so bitter toward his father he begged his grandmother to disinherit him. More to the point, he contends the evidence we described above is not substantial when reviewed in the context of the entire record. Their investigation focused on whether the explosion was an accident. Nor do we find the prosecutor's equally innocuous statement that there is no such thing as a prosecution witness another example of prosecutorial error. Peter was more vocal, but Paul built the bomb that killed him. On December 6 of 2011, agents searched Paul Moores home and found evidence linking him to the crime. And that primer is causing an immediate flash into the cavity of that pipe assembly, the pipe bomb itself, and initiates the explosive charge. Roger made two police reports based on Peter's threats to physically assault him. Again, the limited scope of appellate review presents an insurmountable obstacle. Another expert will do this job. He was responsible for regulating the water levels on the rice fields. Sorry, there are no recent results for popular commented articles. The investigators did not believe that a Mexican gang was involved in the explosion because gangs typically advertise their involvement rather than hide it, to incite fear and command respect. Although none of the individual incidents when taken alone would have demonstrated the type of knowledge necessary to make and install a bomb in an electrical panel device, the jury was entitled to hear how cumulatively they were relevant to whether Paul had the requisite knowledge to install a victim-activated bomb. On July 17 Roger gave the investigators two voice mail messages he had received from Peter. ARLAN MOORE OBITUARY . The lack of complete alignment resulted from the diagram or indented sheet being moved, the diagram being drawn at different times, or a line being overwritten. The jury reasonably could have concluded that his conduct following the explosion was incriminatorymanufacturing spikes that were found in the road and taunting the police in a dramatic chase. That evidence, Paul argued, pointed to Peter's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Peter's house was searched a few days after the explosion. The trial court sustained the defense objection to the prosecution's characterizations, thereby limiting the prejudicial effect of the alleged prosecutorial error. Paul states repeatedly that he did not threaten Roberto Ayala in the entire document as if the document were irrelevant simply because he did not threaten to physically assault him. He stressed that Peter's history of acting out with physical force, coupled with his hatred for Roberto and his lifelong ambition to work his grandfather's farm, constitutes overwhelming evidence that Peter was the murderer. Rainfall around a quarter of an inch. He thought the police were there to search for medical marijuana he was growing. I received another package via USPS, target two, I will not take this job because the info I received is wrong. Diane Nichols, under appointment by . Based on Peter's violent disposition and the threats he leveled at Roberto, among others, the rat trap YouTube video found on his computer, his basic understanding of electrical devices sufficient to enable him to install electric sprinkler systems, his familiarity with the field and with Roberto's responsibilities, his opportunity to plant the bomb, and his compelling motive to remove him from the farm, Paul argued that Peter planted the bomb that Roberto activated when he opened the electrical box to adjust the water levels on the rice field. Peter's best friend, Blane Martin, countered this narrative. 370; People v. Hillhouse (2002) 27 Cal.4th 469, 503-504.) "That's why I took the case.". The forensic pathologist who performed the autopsy opined that the cause of death was explosive shrapnel injuries and high-voltage electrocution.
Civil Suit in California Farm Murder | Courthouse News Service The trial court rejected Paul's allegations, most of which are a repackaging of the arguments we have already addressed. The email address cannot be subscribed. He ran to help him, but his father was unresponsive. Peter was intimately familiar with the field where Roberto was blown up. We are not at liberty to reweigh evidence or revisit credibility issues. The investigators drove around the block a couple of times and on one occasion had eye contact with Paul.
Colusa Sun-Herald Obituaries - Legacy.com Our criminal justice system is predicated on the fundamental notion that a person accused of criminal conduct must be convicted based on evidence that he or she committed the alleged conduct and not merely based on evidence of a criminal disposition or a criminal reputation.
People v. Moore | Law.com By Harold Kruger And, of course, he was ostracized from the farm and estranged from his father. BLEASE, J. (a). Paul's animosity toward Roberto and his feelings of humiliation and resentment were simmering for years, and who better to express his feelings, and inferentially his motive, to the jury than Paul himself? The police officers confiscated a laptop computer, a combined printer-copier, a partial roll of stamps similar to those used on the second letter sent to the sheriff, an unopened label maker, file folders that had been marked with labels created with a label maker, and manila envelopes similar to the one used for the first letter. Defense counsel, anticipating the very strategy the prosecutors ultimately used, complained to the trial court that the first prosecutor offered only a short opening argument, whereas the second prosecutor had argued for over two hours when she once again objected to the sandbagging. Neither Peter's nor Paul's DNA matched swabs taken from the letters, envelopes, and stamps. Colusa Cemetery District grounds was established as a cemetery in 1873.
(People v. Johnson (2000) 77 Cal.App.4th 410, 417-419. "I said, 'Pete, the jury now knows it was not Peter Moore, it was Paul Moore," Poyner said. In The Court of Appeal of the State of California. Search by Name, Phone, Address, or Email. All rights reserved. Please try again. On July 16, 2011, Roberto Ayala and his son were on the Moore brothers rice fields, and Ayala was adjusting an irrigation pump when he son heard a loud explosion and then saw his father on fire, according to the original court case. Once it gets free enough to the point, and that won't take a whole lot, that washer drops or is free, and then that bolt drops, pulls the line through the first nut on the top, pulls the nut or the line through the bottom nut over here, the second one, which yanks on this little trigger right there releasing the bale. Please include what you were doing when this page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page. . Ruben was born in Woodland, CA, on January 27, 1941, to Frank and Eleanor Reynoso. One of the investigators described the diagram of the bomb as follows: It's a diagram that has writing around the diagram and on the diagram. Although he had used the irrigation pump years earlier when he was shooting ducks, the mechanism had been changed and he testified he did not know how to use the new apparatus. He denied involvement in the explosion, declaring it was a chicken shit way for somebody to do it. As mentioned earlier, he claimed he had little experience with electrical devices and no experience with the irrigation pumps. Of Paul Moore, Poyner said, "the guy is evil. 13.56.206.54 Peter testified he was going to physically beat up Roberto. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PAUL ROGER MOORE, Defendant and Appellant. In 2019, the board of supervisors of Colusa met. Winds S at 20 to 30 mph. On that same day, Paul cast aspersions on Peter. Rain. But Paul insists the prosecutor's rebuttal constituted error, even if we assume it was not intentional. Gus was . Im going to get that F*****.. History. You have permission to edit this article. Indeed, shortly before the explosion, Roberto had injured his shoulder and Peter declared that [w]hen his wing is better, he's all mine. He was upset that Roberto spent Father's Day with Gus and that they were together all the time. The text of the letter was a photocopy of the original; it too contained printed label strips made with a label maker. (People v. Hendrix (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th 216, 238.) Whoever is driving the Ford is very much in danger. The prosecutor argued to the jury that scientific experts often use science speak or nerd speak to hedge what they are really saying. Low 41F. Gunner believed his dad could repair just about anything and could make something out of nothing. One of Paul's favorite hobbies, according to Gunner, was assembling and flying radio-controlled airplanes. There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data. A bomb-sniffing dog did not alert on anything explosive in the house, garage, or truck. We must accept its determination. In the second message, Peter said he had worked for 21 years so he could have a chance to farm; that he wanted his grandfather's farm to stay in the family, but his father had disinherited him; that he and Roger were now screwed and he was not going to get a chance to farm; that he had never had a father except biologically; that his father was a douchebag and had never given him a penny; that Roger could not see the Ayala boys over there ripping [him] off blind; and that Roberto had his kid driving the harvester. I am sure MS-13 will figure out I tipped authorities and will soon come for me. Beyond the substance of the arguments, Paul contends the prosecutors sandbagged him by withholding the most powerful evidence until rebuttal and depriving him of the opportunity to answer that evidence. Paul objects to the prosecutor's use of a DNA analogy. The freehand drawing has some arrows on it. In the explosive expert's opinion, the evidence collected from the scene of the explosion was consistent with the diagram of the bomb, including a bolt with the piece of fishing line, pieces of a sprayed-black plastic bottle, plastic wrap, and washers and bolts that might have been part of the bomb. Moore was convicted of killing Roberto Ayala. Chance of rain 100%. The next day, the investigators at the Colusa County Sheriff's Department received a letter with a postmark from Sacramento that they learned was processed by the postal service in West Sacramento. The money, which is expected to grow to $26,571, will help fund the son's college education, Gingery said. Arlan "Gus" Richard Moore passed away at the age of 77 at his home in Grimes on March 29, 2015. . Ayala was killed in an explosion in 2013. Moreover, he was aware of the 19 years Roberto had dedicated to the Moore brothers' farm and had watched at a distance as Roberto ascended to the position he coveted. The settlement awarded the family $20 million as well as $44,800 in workers compensation payment. Eschewing the old formulation characterizing a prosecutor's behavior as misconduct and urging us to consider the more forgiving label of prosecutorial error, the Attorney General defends the prosecutor's rebuttal argument and insists the court did not err by foreclosing the defense from making a surrebuttal argument as requested. According to Gingery, the Moores receive millions in agricultural subsidies annually. Paul concedes that the standard of review is an abuse of discretion, but he cautions us not to rely on the colorful descriptions and derisive boilerplates the Attorney General uses to describe abuse of discretion, including such catchphrases as a court abuses its discretion when the ruling is arbitrary, capricious, or patently absurd, resulting in a manifest miscarriage of justice. Rather, he insists the ultimate question is whether the court's ruling was unreasonable in light of the governing law and the facts presented. To the contrary, the prosecutor did nothing more than marshal validly admitted evidence to counter defense argument: that is, the prosecutor referred to wiretapping evidence to demonstrate that Paul had superior technical skills to Peter and to his My Life entries to demonstrate he had a motive to kill Roberto, based on a lifetime of indignities and slights he felt on the farm. #Dateline tonight at 9/8c. Recipients of payments . In describing his life, he pondered what he had done to be treated so poorly by his own family. He told investigators he had operated the panel five days before the explosion, and he drew an accurate picture of the panel.
Paul maintains the prosecutor's comparison to DNA analysis imputed an accuracy to the paper and ink analysis that was not in evidence, and therefore it was error to allow the prosecutor to argue the ink, paper, and labels were matches. We agree with the trial court that the argument was permissible as a mere example or analogy. Offer condolences/tributes, send flowers or create an online memorial for free. Cemetery Records. Rogers exact whereabouts as of 2020 remain unknown. This envelope had a postmark from Colusa. Whatever they uncovered at his house, tied him to the evidence collected from the crime scene. Motive is one of the elements the defense argued most vehemently. As a result, Roger had the duck blinds removed. However, the 3rd District Court of Appeals did not find any reason to overturn the verdict.
Paul Moore convicted in Colusa bombing death - Appeal-Democrat The prosecutor characterized Paul's wiretapping of his ex-wife as creepy and really unusual, and stated he taunted his ex-wife's parents by telling them about the wiretapping. Moore was cuffed and booked at the Colusa County Jail at the age of 47. Paul was well represented at trial, and his lawyer effectively lodged these arguments, and many more, to the jurors. On July 12, 2011, Peter had texted Paul that he had been landscaping for 21 years, needed to get out, wanted to farm, was trying to get people to talk to Roger, and hoped that Paul would talk to Roger to help him get started farming. Paul injured his back and had to give up construction. He was the farm foreman. Similarly, when Roberto and Paul disagreed about a design for a mud chisel, Roberto's idea garnered Roger's blessing. Third Appellate District (Colusa) (Super. Because the My Life document was highly probative, it is not surprising or improper that the prosecutor quoted it in the opening of his rebuttal argument. The jury was well acquainted with the wiretapping evidence as well as with Paul's description of his life. We cannot say the trial court's denial of defense counsel's request for surrebuttal constituted an abuse of discretion under these circumstances, and we also cannot say that additional argument on the same themes already argued would have changed the jurors' finding that Paul was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Roger encouraged Roberto to seek a restraining order against Peter, but Roberto declined. Peter insists that on his deathbed his grandfather expressed his desire for Peter to farm the walnut orchards. and plate number. A Colusa County judge approved the judgment last month in the wrongful death lawsuit filed in 2013 by Jesus, Maria and Paola Ayala against Moore Brothers, Arlan Moore, Paul Moore and Roger Moore. White Ford, same plate number. I am over this life. This was my first and final job. According to the Colusa County Sun Herald, Paul Moores sentencing and conviction was upheld in 2016. He described how the booby trap would detonate, as follows: So imagine you take a metal box, typical control panel, electrical, that has the lip that goes around, and you have that little washer pin in there so that the lip of the box, I imagine, the door to the box and the box itself has this little washer sandwiched in between them so that it can't fall down. (People v. Olguin (1994) 31 Cal.App.4th 1355, 1373.) Instead, he agreed that the saying, Don't let your bulldog mouth let your mockingbird ass get in trouble applied to Peter. pic.twitter.com/Fu6Kov30EN, Dateline NBC (@DatelineNBC) July 23, 2020. The next guy might not catch the error in info and the wrong person will die. "My sister-in-law is friends with the family," he said. He is also survived by his brother, Roger Moore. Roger Moore was believed to be worth 80 million when he died in May 2017 The 007 actor had 30m in property including a luxury Monaco apartment His fourth wife Kristina, 77, was placed into . The delivery and return addresses were printed label strips made with a label maker. However, we have been able to discern that he is currently at Colusa, and is a pillar of the community. Eduardo Ayala testified that he knew Peter characterized him and his coworkers as a lazy group of drug addicts and alcoholics who would ruin the Moore brothers' agricultural business. Most significantly, they shared their animosity toward Roberto Ayala. The investigators would later discover that Paul had deleted individual text messages he had sent to and received from Peter. "I love my three children a lot, and I think all three know I wouldn't lie for them," Roger Moore said. Their hopes had not materialized. He thought he was safe in the States.
Moore Farms / White Wolf Potato Co. | Moore Farms Moore is the owner of the Moore Brothers Farm. We will review that evidence in two steps: first, we will outline the evidence of solid, credible value the jury could have reasonably relied upon in finding Paul guilty of murder beyond a reasonable doubt. Winds S at 20 to 30 mph. According to the Environmental Working Group Farm Subsidy Database, Moore Brothers received about $2.1 million in subsidies from 1995-2014. To understand if, why, and how Paul would have blown up Roberto, the prosecution attempted to tell the painful story of the men of the Moore family farm and their tortured relationships. COLUSA COUNTY (CBS13) - A man has been convicted of murdering a farmworker by setting a bomb in an electrical panel that was triggered by the victim at irrigation pump. Do I think Peter (Paul's cousin) did this? 2023 Cinemaholic Inc. All rights reserved. (People v. Kipp (1998) 18 Cal.4th 349, 369. By July 2011 Paul had been reintegrated into the farm and had been promised a partnership with his father. Click to reveal (Evid. The forensic evidence, as we have described it, connects Paul to the drafting of the second letter and bomb diagram sent to the sheriff's department. According to Consuelo Conedy-Ruiz, the wife of one of the farm workers, Peter intentionally ran over her dog and drove away. We agree with the trial court that the document was therefore relevant to prove motive. Second, Paul claims the substance of the rebuttal argument constitutes prosecutorial misconduct. There were no eyewitnesses, no confessions, no admissions, and no fingerprints or DNA evidence found on any of the parts of the explosive device found at the scene of the murder. Thus, he was suggesting by analogy that the document examiner could not say the papers were a positive match. The trial court rejected the defense claim that the prosecutor improperly had compared paper stock analysis to DNA analysis when there was no DNA analysis in evidence. Obituaries from McNary-Moore Funeral Service in Colusa, California. "But, I never had a doubt that my investigation team put together a rock-solid case," Poyner said. This vehicle info is the same as the first job. This information was not disclosed to the public. The investigators did not desire to have personal contact with Paul at the time, so when he saw them driving by his house, the investigators drove away from the area. Rainfall around a quarter of an inch. For example, Peter's hands shook as he tried to connect PVC (polyvinyl chloride) pipes and install sprinkler systems. Elena Paul & Kurt Richter Jv * Colusa, CA 95932: $1,211,092 * USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. There was no direct evidence of who designed, constructed, or placed the explosive device. Colusa County District Attorney John Poyner announced early on he would not seek the death penalty. The bolts were just like the bolt discovered at the scene of the explosion. Records published here were acquired from Colusa . Sorry, there are no recent results for popular commented articles. Paul Moore is the son of Roger Moore, who co-owns the 1,800 acre family farm with his brother, Gus Moore. One of Pauls complaints was that Peter got an air-conditioned cab, while he drove the tractor, simply because he was unbearable to work with, otherwise. They will find him. While Moores exact net worth as of 2020 is unknown, he must be worth millions. According to Peter, the Ayala brothers agitated Paul and he remarked, Those son-of-a-bitches, they are trying to take over my life. Moore is the owner of the Moore Brothers Farm. Paul Wynn Jan. 12, 2023. Eight fingerprints and the left palm print lifted from the indented sheet of paper matched Paul's. But it is the jury's prerogative, not ours, to weigh the evidence. Paul was free to argue that the document itself proved he had no intention of harming Roberto because, even in his most private moments, he did not threaten him. From this evidence, the jury could reasonably infer that Paul had both the aptitude and unique skill set needed to build the type of explosive device that killed Roberto Ayala. But Peter's situation was far different. He also testified that Paul had told him that Roberto had said he was only good for picking up trash and that Roberto would be receiving Peter's inheritance. "We've waited 25 months and seven days for this moment," said Eduardo Ayala, brother of the victim. (People v. Ochoa (1993) 6 Cal.4th 1199, 1206.) During trial, however, the defense offered the testimony of an expert in forensic computer analysis. At the same time, their sons, Peter and Paul, respectively, hated Ayala. You have permission to edit this article. In fact, the incarcerated mans full name is Paul Roger Moore, as a sign of respect to his father. Paul Roger Moore, 49, is facing life in prison with no chance of parole after his first-degree murder conviction with the special-circumstance allegation that he killed Roberto Ayala, 43, by planting. The boy had to run two miles to get help. Chance of rain 100%. We accept for purposes of this issue the trial court's characterization of the defense closing argument. My house and property are protected, larger devices. ] (People v. Robbins (1988) 45 Cal.3d 867, 879; see People v. Kelly (2007) 42 Cal.4th 763, 783.) Again, Paul's critique is the same: that is, the prosecutor grossly exaggerated his fascination with bomb making and extrapolated one incident into a proclivity to create multiple and more advanced explosive devices. But that is not to say a wiretap does not have sufficient probative value to merit admission, and given the minimal risk of potential prejudice, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting evidence that did offer some probative value into the extent of Paul's knowledge about building and connecting electrical and mechanical devices.